
"Love and Justice."
Rev. Dr. Morris Hudgins.
March 18, 2001.
 Readings
Rise
up, oh flame,
By thy light glowing.
Show to us beauty,
Vision, and joy.
O Flaming Chalice,
Symbol of a free faith,
Burn with the holy oil
Of helpfulness and service.
Spread warmth and light and hope;
Warm hearts grown cold with indifference;
Light dark places with justice;
Rekindle hope in despair.
May we
bring fuel for thy fire of love.
May the oil of loving-kindness flow from us
To thy leaping flame.
May hands of service shelter thee,
That no winds of hate may extinguish thy brightness.
May thy light and warmth be eternal.
May we be keepers of thy flame. (Richard Gilbert)
Psalm
82; l-8:
God has
taken his place in the divine council;
in the midst
of the gods he holds judgment;
How long will you judge unjustly and show partiality to the wicked?
Give justice to the weak and the fatherless;
maintain
the right of the afflicted and the destitute.
Rescue the weak and the needy;
deliver
them from the hand of the wicked.
They have neither knowledge nor understanding,
they walk
about in darkness;
all the
foundations of the earth are shaken.
I say, "You are gods, sons of the Most High, all of you;
nevertheless,
you shall die like men, and fall like any prince."
Arise, O God, judge the earth; for to thee belong all the nations!
Introduction
At a recent UU minister's meeting, I asked the four ministers to take
a few minutes to share what inspired them to become UU ministers. My request
demanded that I do this myself. As I reflected, I concluded that my decision
to go into the ministry could not be separated from the events of the
1960's. I could not help but think of Martin Luther King, Jr. and those
who decided to challenge our country's decision to fight in the Vietnam
War. It was during this era that my theology and ethics was born. My ministry
had to have something to do with justice, peace and love. My sermon title
this morning comes out of this struggle between justice and love.
I realize
this sermon may be considered an anachronisma sermon on justice
may have been expected in 1971 but in 2001. This is a popular time to
talk about spirituality but not about justice and social action. I hear
more and more that people come to church to find peace and tranquillitynot
to be bothered by complex problems of the world. It is like in the movie,
Chocolat, which takes place in a small town in France, where the
people of the town, prefer tranquility, no outsiders, no complex problems,
no diversity. In this world of tranquility we are all told to march to
the same drummer and not to march to a drum of protest.
I have come
not to challenge the message of spirituality but to ask you to strike
a balance between seeking the peaceful inner life and making the world
a more human, loving, compassionate, right and just place to live. I would
even contend that one life without the other is incomplete. You cannot
spend all of your time trying to make life better without giving consideration
to your sources of inner strength and visa versa. As a fellowship we should
seek to give attention to both of these important aspects of life.
In this
sermon I give special attention to the Jewish religious tradition because
the Jews have historically practiced their religious beliefs in the context
of history. Religion and history are inter-related and we must never completely
try to separate them.
Justice
in America
In the Old Testament we find several meanings of the word justice. These
several meanings have continued to blur our interpretation of justice
today:
1. The strongest
definition of justice in the Old Testament is that of making things right.
Justice then is a sort of "plumb line." When things get out
of hand they are made right again. God, then is a God of justice. Martin
Luther King, Jr., believed in this kind of justice. "The world,"
he said, "bends toward justice." This is the heart of my faith.
Justice may not come today but ultimate the world bends toward justice.
The Jews
said living a life of justice is even more important than following the
right ceremony or ritual. We find this message very strong in the book
of Amos which says,
I hate,
I despise your feasts, and I take no delight in your solemn assemblies.
Even though you offer me your burnt offerings and cereal offerings,
I will not accept them, but let justice roll down like waters, and righteousness
like an ever-flowing stream.
So according
to Amos and the Jews justice is part of God's worldit is a part
of life that things will even out. Those who do wrong today will receive
their due at a later time. Justice will prevail. The wicked will pay for
their wrongdoing; the righteous will be victors in the end; princes are
made like the common people by this great equalizer. Justice is part of
God's judgment.
We found
in the reading this morning this type of justice. The psalmist calls upon
God to make things right:
Give
justice to the weak and the fatherless; maintain the right of the afflicted
and the destitute. Rescue the weak and the needy; deliver them from
the hand of the wicked (82:4)
2. A second
definition of justicethe one we hear most today is equality, or
fairness. Webster defines justice as being impartial or fair. So if life
is just it is fair. But as we all know, there are times when life is not
fair. Former President Jimmy Carter once said this and I believe it is
true. Justice does not always flow like waters. Therefore, in order for
justice to occur we need people like Dr. King and others who are fighting
for justice, reminding all of us that in order for justice to occur we
must make it happen. This is the important message of humanism.
3. Which
leads me to a third view of justice in the Old Testament: If there is
to be justice, humans must have an important part in it. A sign of our
justice is the way we treat others. So according to this view justice
is a way of doing. We are to treat others as we would be treated ourselves.
The rich are to give to the poor, all are to be treated equally, according
to God's justice. So justice is not only God's actions but also human
action. In this view justice is fairness, integrity, and honesty. It is
the basis of or court of lawthat all people shall be treated in
a fair manner.
This even
applies to criminals. There seems to be a strong sense among many people
today that criminals should not be treated the way others are treated.
Once they become criminals they give up their rights and any sense of
justice. Obviously, a criminal does give up some rights, but not a sense
of fairness and integrity in the judicial system. If we are going to continue
to be a free and democratic society we must hold firm to this sense of
justice. I personally hold to the view that we must not resort to the
methods of criminals in order to bring justice. We find in the book of
Ezekiel:
Thus says
the Lord God: Enough, O prince of Israel! Put away violence and oppression,
and execute justice and righteousness; cease your evictions of my people,
says the Lord God."(45:9)
According
to this view justice is an important part of the religious lifeeven
more important than sacrifice or ritual. But this type of justice does
not necessarily mean equality. Rather, it means that each person deserves
something but not necessarily the same. There is a quote in the New Testament
which reflects this type of justice. It says in Colossians, chapter 4:
"Masters, treat your slaves justly and fairly, knowing that you also
have a Master in heaven." The author is not challenging slavery here.
Instead he is saying that under the conditions of slavery all have their
just due. This is quite different from the person who would challenge
the institution of slavery itself, or capitalism, or the slum, or high
employment. This is another kind of justice.
Justice
in America
It is always helpful to turn to the Bible for help in matters of religion,
but we should not stop there. With this in mind I would like to present
my view of justice in the context of our contemporary world. I will mention
other parts of the world but will focus on the crisis of justice in America.
My conclusions
are based on a few basic assumptions about justice:
1) First,
if justice is going to exist it must be supported by the criminal justice
systemboth for the victims and for the accused. If a society loses
faith in the criminal justice system there can be no justice.
2) Second,
if justice is merely retribution it is not true justice.
3) Third,
justice must always be tempered by love and visa versa. Justice and love
are not opposites but must compliment each other.
4) Fourth,
the existence of justice can result in a peaceful society. Peace does
not exist without justice.
5) Finally,
justice requires freedom and equality, and for these to exist in any society
there must be a segment of society who are vigilant in defense of true
justice.
Before I
expand these views I must admit that the word justice in our culture has
become vague and in some ways over-used. Justice in the modern sense is
that which is right and equal, a fair distribution of goods, it is peaceall
of these things. I believe in justice and I am glad that liberal religion
has often been synonymous with justice. However, I believe it is very
important to sy what we mean by justice. The following are an explanation
of what I mean by justice based on these assumptions I have presented.
l. First, I believe by our commitment to justice we can create a society
that is more fair, equal, and respectful of individuals. I believe we
must encourage and do what we can to build trust in the judicial system.
If that system fails then our society will fail. As one author concludes:
If justice
prevails, good faith is found in treaties, truth in transactions, order
in government, the earth is at peace, and heaven itself sheds over us
its beneficent light and radiates down to us its blessed influence."(J.B.
Bousset)
I know
what many of you are thinkingthis is the standard liberal view of
justice and it no longer applies to our world. There is some truth to
this statement. There is a very important question that must be asked
of us who preach about justice: Can there be justice if criminals are
pampered and victims are forgotten? I would say no.
I believe
we must do what we can to rebuild faith in the criminal justice system.
I fear that in America we have lost this faith. Truth has become less
important than making a deal. Too often innocent people are victimized
and justice goes by the board. If only a small percentage of criminals
are brought to trial then justice does not exist.
If our system is to be truly just we should be concerned about both the
rights of the criminal and the victims in our society. Joseph Klausner
once wrote: "What room is there in the world for justice if we must
extend both cheeks to our assailants and give the thief both coat and
cloak?" My answer is: "There is no justice if we always turn
the other cheek."
2. Before
our Republican members get too excited I must quickly move to my next
conclusion. If justice is merely retribution, there is also no justice.
Retributive justice, as Aristotle called it, is only partial justice.
An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth may have worked in another time
and place but not in the modern world. We do sway from extreme to extreme
and justice must be found somewhere in between.
3. My third conclusion about justice is that it is not the opposite of
love. Justice is the balance to a sentimental love. Paul Tillich saw love
and justice as one side of the other. He wrote:
Justice
is that side of love which affirms the independent right of persons
with the love relation . . . Only love can transform calculating justice
into creative justice. Love makes justice just. Justice without love
is always injustice.
James Luther
Adams, our most noted 20th century Unitarian Universalist scholar, and
a student of Paul Tillich, makes this statement:
The two
basic values of the prophetic covenant, justice and love, work together.
Justice is rendered creative through compassion and care; creative justice
is justice motivated by love rather than by a thirst for retribution."(p.6)
I would
concur with Adams and say that if we in America forget the balance between
love and justice than there will be no justice, even if every criminal
is found guilty and every victim receives payment. Why do I say this?
Because if punishment is the only criterion for true justice then there
will be no peace and tranquillity in our world. Which leads me to my next
assumption:
4. Buddhist
scriptures of the 5th century B.C. combines a belief in justice and love,
peace and commitment to the law. The Dhammapada says:
A person
is not just who carries a matter by violence; no, they who distinguish
both right and wrong and guide others, not by violence but by the same
law, being guardians of the law, are called just.
I would
concur and conclude if there is no justice there is no peace, and if there
is no peace there is no justice. Peace and justice are companions.
5. Which takes me to the fifth and final conclusion about justice: For
justice to exist many people must fight diligently for freedom and equality
for all. Justice cannot occur if a portion of society are enslaved and
do not have equal opportunity. America was not a just society when we
were founded, but some fought diligently for our free and democratic society.
America was not a just society when woman could not take part in the democratic
society.
I will go
one step further. America is not a just society as long as we are a segregated
society. Justice will only come when we see all races as equal and all
have equal opportunity. America is still a society dominated by white
males. We have a long way to go before justice prevails in our midst.
In conclusion
and summary, may we always seek to apply our beliefs to our actions. Let
us not ignore the rights of criminals or of victims. May our belief in
justice be tempered by our compassion and our compassion by our belief
in justice. Never shall we seek to punish for punishment's sake. May we
never assume that when we are free all are free. May we always be vigilant
in seeking freedom, justice and equality for all. I do not pray always
for agreement, but I do pray for faith in action, words and deeds. This
is the call of justice.
Mother Teresa,
the most exemplary prophet of her time, who one day will be St. Teresa
if there is any justice in the Roman Catholic Church, says it this way:
Love
cannot remain by itself
it has no
meaning.
Love has to be put into action
and that
action is service.
Whatever form we are,
able or
disabled,
rich or
poor,
It is not how much we do,
but how
much love we put in the doing,
A lifelong sharing of love with others.
Amen.
|